Updated on 2024/04/18

写真a

 
MICHIBATA Takuro
 
Organization
Faculty of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology Associate Professor
Position
Associate Professor
External link

Degree

  • 博士(理学) ( 2017.9   九州大学 )

Research Interests

  • satellite simulator

  • satellite remote sensing

  • radiation budget

  • hydrological cycle

  • cloud microphysics

  • climate change

  • aerosol

  • general circulation model

  • precipitation

Research Areas

  • Natural Science / Atmospheric and hydrospheric sciences

Research History

  • Okayama University   学術研究院 環境生命自然科学学域   Associate Professor

    2023.4

      More details

  • Okayama University   学術研究院 自然科学学域   Associate Professor

    2021.4 - 2023.3

      More details

  • Kyushu University   Research Institute for Applied Mechanics   Assistant Professor

    2018.8 - 2021.3

      More details

  • The University of Tokyo   Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute   JSPS Research Fellow (PD)

    2018.4 - 2018.7

      More details

  • Kyushu University   Research Institute for Applied Mechanics   JSPS Research Fellow (PD)

    2017.10 - 2018.3

      More details

  • Kyushu University   Department of Earth System Science and Technology   JSPS Research Fellow (DC1)

    2015.4 - 2017.9

      More details

▼display all

Professional Memberships

Committee Memberships

  •   COSP (CFMIP Observation Simulator Package) Project Management Committee  

    2022.9   

      More details

    Committee type:Academic society

    researchmap

 

Papers

  • Significant increase in graupel and lightning occurrence in a warmer climate simulated by prognostic graupel parameterization Reviewed

    Takuro Michibata

    Scientific Reports   14 ( 1 )   2024.2

     More details

    Authorship:Lead author, Corresponding author   Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)  

    There is little consensus among global climate models (CGMs) regarding the response of lightning flash rates to past and future climate change, largely due to graupel not being included in models. Here a two-moment prognostic graupel scheme was incorporated into the MIROC6 GCM and applied in three experiments involving pre-industrial aerosol, present-day, and future warming simulations. The new microphysics scheme performed well in reproducing global distributions of graupel, convective available potential energy, and lightning flash rate against satellite retrievals and reanalysis datasets. The global mean lightning rate increased by 7.1% from the pre-industrial period to the present day, which was attributed to increased graupel occurrence. The impact of future warming on lightning activity was more evident, with the rate increasing by 18.4%K-1 through synergistic contributions of destabilization and increased graupel. In the Arctic, the lightning rate depends strongly on the seasonality of graupel, emphasizing the need to incorporate graupel into GCMs for more accurate climate prediction.

    DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54544-5

    Scopus

    PubMed

    researchmap

  • Droplet collection efficiencies estimated from satellite retrievals constrain effective radiative forcing of aerosol-cloud interactions Reviewed

    Charlotte M. Beall, Po-Lun Ma, Matthew W. Christensen, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Adam Varble, Kentaroh Suzuki, Takuro Michibata

    EGUsphere [preprint]   2023.11

  • Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in the Climate System Invited Reviewed

    Michibata, Takuro

    Handbook of Air Quality and Climate Change   1139 - 1180   2023.9

     More details

    Authorship:Lead author, Corresponding author   Publishing type:Part of collection (book)   Publisher:Springer Singapore  

    Michibata, T. (2023). Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in the Climate System. In: Akimoto, H., Tanimoto, H. (eds) Handbook of Air Quality and Climate Change. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2760-9_35

    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-2527-8_35-3

    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-2760-9_35

    researchmap

  • CERESMIP: a climate modeling protocol to investigate recent trends in the Earth's Energy Imbalance Reviewed

    Gavin A. Schmidt, Timothy Andrews, Susanne E. Bauer, Paul J. Durack, Norman G. Loeb, V. Ramaswamy, Nathan P. Arnold, Michael G. Bosilovich, Jason Cole, Larry W. Horowitz, Gregory C. Johnson, John M. Lyman, Brian Medeiros, Takuro Michibata, Dirk Olonscheck, David Paynter, Shiv Priyam Raghuraman, Michael Schulz, Daisuke Takasuka, Vijay Tallapragada, Patrick C. Taylor, Tilo Ziehn

    Frontiers in Climate   5   2023.7

     More details

    Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher:Frontiers Media SA  

    The Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) project has now produced over two decades of observed data on the Earth's Energy Imbalance (EEI) and has revealed substantive trends in both the reflected shortwave and outgoing longwave top-of-atmosphere radiation components. Available climate model simulations suggest that these trends are incompatible with purely internal variability, but that the full magnitude and breakdown of the trends are outside of the model ranges. Unfortunately, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (Phase 6) (CMIP6) protocol only uses observed forcings to 2014 (and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) projections thereafter), and furthermore, many of the ‘observed' drivers have been updated substantially since the CMIP6 inputs were defined. Most notably, the sea surface temperature (SST) estimates have been revised and now show up to 50% greater trends since 1979, particularly in the southern hemisphere. Additionally, estimates of short-lived aerosol and gas-phase emissions have been substantially updated. These revisions will likely have material impacts on the model-simulated EEI. We therefore propose a new, relatively low-cost, model intercomparison, CERESMIP, that would target the CERES period (2000-present), with updated forcings to at least the end of 2021. The focus will be on atmosphere-only simulations, using updated SST, forcings and emissions from 1990 to 2021. The key metrics of interest will be the EEI and atmospheric feedbacks, and so the analysis will benefit from output from satellite cloud observation simulators. The Tier 1 request would consist only of an ensemble of AMIP-style simulations, while the Tier 2 request would encompass uncertainties in the applied forcing, atmospheric composition, single and all-but-one forcing responses. We present some preliminary results and invite participation from a wide group of models.

    DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2023.1202161

    researchmap

  • Too Frequent and Too Light Arctic Snowfall With Incorrect Precipitation Phase Partitioning in the MIROC6 GCM Reviewed

    Yuki Imura, Takuro Michibata

    Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems   2022.11

     More details

    Authorship:Corresponding author   Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)  

    DOI: 10.1029/2022MS003046

    researchmap

  • Impacts of Precipitation Modeling on Cloud Feedback in MIROC6 Reviewed

    N. Hirota, T. Michibata, H. Shiogama, T. Ogura, K. Suzuki

    Geophysical Research Letters   49 ( 5 )   e2021GL096523   2022.3

     More details

    Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher:American Geophysical Union (AGU)  

    DOI: 10.1029/2021GL096523

    researchmap

    Other Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1029/2021GL096523

  • Snow-induced buffering in aerosol–cloud interactions Reviewed

    Takuro Michibata, Kentaroh Suzuki, Toshihiko Takemura

    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics   20 ( 22 )   13771 - 13780   2020.11

     More details

    Authorship:Lead author, Corresponding author   Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher:Copernicus GmbH  

    Abstract. Complex aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions lead to large differences in estimates of aerosol impacts on climate among general circulation models (GCMs) and satellite retrievals. Typically, precipitating hydrometeors are treated diagnostically in most GCMs, and their radiative effects are ignored. Here, we quantify how the treatment of precipitation influences the simulated effective radiative forcing due to aerosol–cloud interactions (ERFaci) using a state-of-the-art GCM with a two-moment prognostic precipitation scheme that incorporates the radiative effect of precipitating particles, and we investigate how microphysical process representations are related to macroscopic climate effects. Prognostic precipitation substantially weakens the magnitude of ERFaci (by approximately 54 %) compared with the traditional diagnostic scheme, and this is the result of the increased longwave (warming) and weakened shortwave (cooling) components of ERFaci. The former is attributed to additional adjustment processes induced by falling snow, and the latter stems largely from riming of snow by collection of cloud droplets. The significant reduction in ERFaci does not occur without prognostic snow, which contributes mainly by buffering the cloud response to aerosol perturbations through depleting cloud water via collection. Prognostic precipitation also alters the regional pattern of ERFaci, particularly over northern midlatitudes where snow is abundant. The treatment of precipitation is thus a highly influential controlling factor of ERFaci, contributing more than other uncertain “tunable” processes related to aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions. This change in ERFaci caused by the treatment of precipitation is large enough to explain the existing difference in ERFaci between GCMs and observations.

    DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-13771-2020

    researchmap

  • Reconciling Compensating Errors Between Precipitation Constraints and the Energy Budget in a Climate Model Reviewed

    Takuro Michibata, Kentaroh Suzuki

    Geophysical Research Letters   47 ( 12 )   e2020GL088340   2020.6

     More details

    Authorship:Lead author, Corresponding author   Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher:American Geophysical Union (AGU)  

    ©2020. The Authors. Precipitation microphysics and the effective radiative forcing due to aerosol-cloud interactions (ERFaci) contribute to some of the largest uncertainties in general circulation models (GCMs) and are closely interrelated. This study shows that a sophisticated, two-moment prognostic precipitation scheme can simultaneously represent both warm rain characteristics consistent with satellite observations and a realistic ERFaci magnitude, thus reconciling compensating errors between precipitation microphysics and ERFaci that are common to many GCMs. The enhancement of accretion from prognostic precipitation and accretion-driven buffering mechanisms in scavenging processes are found to be responsible for mitigating the compensating errors. However, single-moment prognostic precipitation without the explicit prediction of raindrop size cannot capture observed warm rain characteristics. Results underscore the importance of using a two-moment representation of both clouds and precipitation to realistically simulate precipitation-driven buffering of the cloud response to aerosol perturbations.

    DOI: 10.1029/2020gl088340

    Scopus

    researchmap

    Other Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1029/2020GL088340

  • Incorporation of inline warm rain diagnostics into the COSP2 satellite simulator for process-oriented model evaluation Reviewed

    Takuro Michibata, Kentaroh Suzuki, Tomoo Ogura, Xianwen Jing

    Geoscientific Model Development   12 ( 10 )   4297 - 4307   2019.10

     More details

    Authorship:Lead author, Corresponding author   Language:English   Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher:Copernicus {GmbH}  

    © 2019 Geoscientific Model Development. All rights reserved. The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project Observational Simulator Package (COSP) is used to diagnose model performance and physical processes via an apple-to-apple comparison to satellite measurements. Although the COSP provides useful information about clouds and their climatic impact, outputs that have a subcolumn dimension require large amounts of data. This can cause a bottleneck when conducting sets of sensitivity experiments or multiple model intercomparisons. Here, we incorporate two diagnostics for warm rain microphysical processes into the latest version of the simulator (COSP2). The first one is the occurrence frequency of warm rain regimes (i.e., non-precipitating, drizzling, and precipitating) classified according to CloudSat radar reflectivity, putting the warm rain process diagnostics into the context of the geographical distributions of precipitation. The second diagnostic is the probability density function of radar reflectivity profiles normalized by the in-cloud optical depth, the so-called contoured frequency by optical depth diagram (CFODD), which illustrates how the warm rain processes occur in the vertical dimension using statistics constructed from CloudSat and MODIS simulators. The new diagnostics are designed to produce statistics online along with subcolumn information during the COSP execution, eliminating the need to output subcolumn variables. Users can also readily conduct regional analysis tailored to their particular research interest (e.g., land-ocean differences) using an auxiliary post-process package after the COSP calculation. The inline diagnostics are applied to the MIROC6 general circulation model (GCM) to demonstrate how known biases common among multiple GCMs relative to satellite observations are revealed. The inline multi-sensor diagnostics are intended to serve as a tool that facilitates process-oriented model evaluations in a manner that reduces the burden on modelers for their diagnostics effort.

    DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-4297-2019

    Scopus

    researchmap

  • Strengthened Indian Summer Monsoon Precipitation Susceptibility Linked to Dust‐Induced Ice Cloud Modification Reviewed

    Piyushkumar N. Patel, Ritesh Gautam, Takuro Michibata, Harish Gadhavi

    Geophysical Research Letters   46 ( 14 )   8431 - 8441   2019.7

     More details

    Language:English   Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher:American Geophysical Union ({AGU})  

    DOI: 10.1029/2018GL081634

    researchmap

  • Prognostic Precipitation in the MIROC6-SPRINTARS GCM: Description and Evaluation Against Satellite Observations Reviewed

    Takuro Michibata, Kentaroh Suzuki, Miho Sekiguchi, Toshihiko Takemura

    Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems   11 ( 3 )   839 - 860   2019.3

     More details

    Authorship:Lead author, Corresponding author   Language:English   Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher:American Geophysical Union ({AGU})  

    ©2019. The Authors. A comprehensive two-moment microphysics scheme is incorporated into the MIROC6-SPRINTARS general circulation model (GCM). The new scheme includes prognostic precipitation for both rain and snow and considers their radiative effects. To evaluate the impacts of applying different treatments of precipitation and the associated radiative effect, we perform climate simulations employing both the traditional diagnostic and new prognostic precipitation schemes, the latter also being tested with and without incorporating the radiative effect of snow. The prognostic precipitation, which maintains precipitation in the atmosphere across multiple time steps, models the ratio of accretion to autoconversion as being approximately an order of magnitude higher than that for the diagnostic scheme. Such changes in microphysical process rates tend to reduce the cloud water susceptibility as the autoconversion process is the only pathway through which aerosols can influence rain formation. The resultant anthropogenic aerosol effect is reduced by approximately 21% in the prognostic precipitation scheme. Modifications to the microphysical process rates also change the vertical distribution of hydrometeors in the manner that increases the fractional occurrence of single-layered warm clouds by 38%. The new scheme mitigates the excess of supercooled liquid water produced by the previous scheme and increases the total mass of ice hydrometeors. Both characteristics are consistent with CloudSat/CALIPSO retrievals. The radiative effect of snow is significant at both longwave and shortwave (6.4 and 5.1 W/m2 in absolute values, respectively) and can alter the precipitation fields via energetic controls on precipitation. These results suggest that the prognostic precipitation scheme, with its radiative effects incorporated, makes an indispensable contribution to improving the reliability of climate modeling.

    DOI: 10.1029/2018MS001596

    Scopus

    researchmap

  • The key role of warm rain parameterization in determining the aerosol indirect effect in a global climate model Reviewed

    Xianwen Jing, Kentaroh Suzuki, Takuro Michibata

    Journal of Climate   32 ( 14 )   4409 - 4430   2019

     More details

    Authorship:Last author   Language:English   Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)  

    © 2019 American Meteorological Society. Global climate models (GCMs) have been found to share the common too-frequent bias in the warm rain formation process. In this study, five different autoconversion schemes are incorporated into a single GCM, to systematically evaluate the warm rain formation processes in comparison with satellite observations and investigate their effects on the aerosol indirect effect (AIE). It is found that some schemes generate warm rain less efficiently under polluted conditions in the manner closer to satellite observations, while the others generate warm rain too frequently. Large differences in AIE are found among these schemes. It is remarkable that the schemes with more observation-like warm rain formation processes exhibit larger AIEs that far exceed the uncertainty range reported in IPCC AR5, to an extent that can cancel much of the warming trend in the past century, whereas schemes with too-frequent rain formations yield AIEs that are well bounded by the reported range. The power-law dependence of the autoconversion rate on the cloud droplet number concentration β is found to affect substantially the susceptibility of rain formation to aerosols: the more negative β is, the more difficult it is for rain to be triggered in polluted clouds, leading to larger AIE through substantial contributions from the wet scavenging feedback. The appropriate use of a droplet size threshold can mitigate the effect of a less negative β. The role of the warm rain formation process on AIE in this particular model has broad implications for others that share the too-frequent rain-formation bias.

    DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0789.1

    Scopus

    researchmap

  • Aerosol effects on cloud water amounts were successfully simulated by a global cloud-system resolving model Reviewed

    Yousuke Sato, Daisuke Goto, Takuro Michibata, Kentaroh Suzuki, Toshihiko Takemura, Hirofumi Tomita, Teruyuki Nakajima

    Nature Communications   9 ( 1 )   985   2018.12

     More details

    Language:English   Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher:Springer Nature  

    © 2018 The Author(s). Aerosols affect climate by modifying cloud properties through their role as cloud condensation nuclei or ice nuclei, called aerosol-cloud interactions. In most global climate models (GCMs), the aerosol-cloud interactions are represented by empirical parameterisations, in which the mass of cloud liquid water (LWP) is assumed to increase monotonically with increasing aerosol loading. Recent satellite observations, however, have yielded contradictory results: LWP can decrease with increasing aerosol loading. This difference implies that GCMs overestimate the aerosol effect, but the reasons for the difference are not obvious. Here, we reproduce satellite-observed LWP responses using a global simulation with explicit representations of cloud microphysics, instead of the parameterisations. Our analyses reveal that the decrease in LWP originates from the response of evaporation and condensation processes to aerosol perturbations, which are not represented in GCMs. The explicit representation of cloud microphysics in global scale modelling reduces the uncertainty of climate prediction.

    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03379-6

    Scopus

    PubMed

    researchmap

  • The source of discrepancies in aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions between GCM and A-Train retrievals Reviewed

    Takuro Michibata, Kentaroh Suzuki, Yousuke Sato, Toshihiko Takemura

    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS   16 ( 23 )   15413 - 15424   2016.12

     More details

    Authorship:Lead author, Corresponding author   Language:English   Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher:COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH  

    Aerosol-cloud interactions are one of the most uncertain processes in climate models due to their nonlinear complexity. A key complexity arises from the possibility that clouds can respond to perturbed aerosols in two opposite ways, as characterized by the traditional "cloud lifetime" hypothesis and more recent "buffered system" hypothesis. Their importance in climate simulations remains poorly understood. Here we investigate the response of the liquid water path (LWP) to aerosol perturbations for warm clouds from the perspective of general circulation model (GCM) and A-Train remote sensing, through process-oriented model evaluations. A systematic difference is found in the LWP response between the model results and observations. The model results indicate a near-global uniform increase of LWP with increasing aerosol loading, while the sign of the response of the LWP from the A-Train varies from region to region. The satellite-observed response of the LWP is closely related to meteorological and/or macrophysical factors, in addition to the microphysics. The model does not reproduce this variability of cloud susceptibility (i.e., sensitivity of LWP to perturbed aerosols) because the parameterization of the autoconversion process assumes only suppression of rain formation in response to increased cloud droplet number, and does not consider macrophysical aspects that serve as a mechanism for the negative responses of the LWP via enhancements of evaporation and precipitation. Model biases are also found in the precipitation microphysics, which suggests that the model generates rainwater readily even when little cloud water is present. This essentially causes projections of unrealistically frequent and light rain, with high cloud susceptibilities to aerosol perturbations.

    DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-15413-2016

    Web of Science

    researchmap

  • Evaluation of autoconversion schemes in a single model framework with satellite observations Reviewed

    Takuro Michibata, Toshihiko Takemura

    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES   120 ( 18 )   9570 - 9590   2015.9

     More details

    Authorship:Lead author, Corresponding author   Language:English   Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher:AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION  

    We examined the performance of autoconversion (mass transfer from cloud water to rainwater by the coalescence of cloud droplets) schemes in warm rain, which are commonly used in general circulation models. To exclude biases in the different treatment of the aerosol-cloud-precipitation-radiation interaction other than that of the autoconversion process, sensitivity experiments were conducted within a single model framework using an aerosol-climate model, MIROC-SPRINTARS. The liquid water path (LWP) and cloud optical thickness have a particularly high sensitivity to the autoconversion schemes, and their sensitivity is of the same magnitude as model biases. In addition, the ratio of accretion to autoconversion (Acc/Aut ratio), a key parameter in the examination of the balance of microphysical conversion processes, also has a high sensitivity globally depending on the scheme used. Although the Acc/Aut ratio monotonically increases with increasing LWP, significantly lower ratio is observed in Kessler-type schemes. Compared to satellite observations, a poor representation of cloud macrophysical structure and optically thicker low cloud are found in simulations with any autoconversion scheme. As a result of the cloud-radiation interaction, the difference in the global mean net cloud radiative forcing (NetCRF) among the schemes reaches 10 Wm(-2). The discrepancy between the observed and simulated NetCRF is especially large with a high LWP. The potential uncertainty in the parameterization of the autoconversion process is nonnegligible, and no formulation significantly improves the bias in the cloud radiative effect yet. This means that more fundamental errors are still left in other processes of the model.

    DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023818

    Web of Science

    researchmap

  • The effects of aerosols on water cloud microphysics and macrophysics based on satellite-retrieved data over East Asia and the North Pacific Reviewed

    T. Michibata, K. Kawamoto, T. Takemura

    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS   14 ( 21 )   11935 - 11948   2014

     More details

    Authorship:Lead author, Corresponding author   Language:English   Publishing type:Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher:COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH  

    This study examines the characteristics of the microphysics and macrophysics of water clouds from East Asia to the North Pacific, using data from active CloudSat radar measurements and passive MODerate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) retrievals. Our goals are to clarify differences in microphysics and macrophysics between land and oceanic clouds, seasonal differences unique to the midlatitudes, characteristics of the drizzling process, and cloud vertical structure. In pristine oceanic areas, fractional occurrences of cloud optical thickness (COT) and cloud droplet effective radius (CDR) increase systematically with an increase in drizzle intensity, but these characteristics of the COT and CDR transition are less evident in polluted land areas. In addition, regional and seasonal differences are identified in terms of drizzle intensity as a function of the liquid water path (LWP) and cloud droplet number concentration (N-c). The correlations between drizzle intensity and LWP, and between drizzle intensity and N-c, are both more robust over oceanic areas than over land areas. We also demonstrate regional and seasonal characteristics of the cloud vertical structure. Our results suggest that aerosol-cloud interaction mainly occurs around the cloud base in polluted land areas during the winter season. In addition, a difference between polluted and pristine areas in the efficiency of cloud droplet growth is confirmed. These results suggest that water clouds over the midlatitudes exhibit a different drizzle system to those over the tropics.

    DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-11935-2014

    Web of Science

    researchmap

▼display all

MISC

  • 数値気候モデルと衛星観測の複合利用によるエアロゾル・雲・降水相互作用に関する研究 Invited Reviewed

    道端拓朗

    天気, 日本気象学会   68 ( 6 )   277 - 290   2021.6

     More details

    Authorship:Lead author, Corresponding author  

    researchmap

  • 第4回気象気候若手研究者交流会開催報告 Reviewed

    釜江陽一, 栃本英伍, 西川はつみ, 宇野史睦, 山崎哲, 川瀬宏明, 辻野智紀, 神山翼, 大竹潤, 山下陽介, 道端拓朗, 川添祥, 神澤望, 築地原匠, 木下武也

    天気, 日本気象学会   65(9)   643 - 648   2018.9

     More details

  • Report on 17th International Conference on Clouds and Precipitation (ICCP2016) Reviewed

    63 ( 11 )   862 - 868   2016.11

     More details

Awards

  • 山本賞

    2019.10   日本気象学会  

    道端 拓朗

     More details

Research Projects

  • 局地降水の再現性向上を目指した新しい降水モデリング手法の開発と温暖化影響の解明

    Grant number:23K13171  2023.04 - 2026.03

    日本学術振興会  科学研究費助成事業 若手研究  若手研究

    道端 拓朗

      More details

    Authorship:Principal investigator 

    Grant amount:\4680000 ( Direct expense: \3600000 、 Indirect expense:\1080000 )

    researchmap

  • 多圏間の相互作用を紐解く新しい地球温暖化科学の創設

    2021.04 - 2028.03

    科学技術振興機構(JST)  創発的研究支援事業 

    道端 拓朗

      More details

    Authorship:Principal investigator 

    researchmap

  • 【S-20】テーマ1サブテーマ(4) 短寿命気候強制因子による大気水循環変動の定量的評価

    2021.04 - 2026.03

    環境再生保全機構  環境研究総合推進費(戦略的研究開発) 

    鈴木健太郎

      More details

    Authorship:Coinvestigator(s) 

    researchmap

  • 地球温暖化予測のための時空間シームレスな降雨・降雪スキームの開発

    2020.04 - 2022.03

    環境再生保全機構  環境研究総合推進費(革新型研究開発) 

    道端 拓朗

      More details

    Authorship:Principal investigator 

    researchmap

  • 階層的数値モデル群による短寿命気候強制因子の組成別・地域別定量的気候影響評価

    2019.04 - 2024.03

    日本学術振興会  科学研究費補助金・基盤研究(S) 

    竹村 俊彦

      More details

    Authorship:Coinvestigator(s)  Grant type:Competitive

    researchmap

  • 数値モデルに適用する雲氷・降雪粒子の新スキーム開発による気候予測の高精度化

    2019.04 - 2023.03

    日本学術振興会  科学研究費補助金・若手研究 

    道端 拓朗

      More details

    Authorship:Principal investigator  Grant type:Competitive

    researchmap

  • 全球エアロゾル気候モデルにおける降⽔過程の⾼度化

    2018.04 - 2020.03

    九州大学応用力学研究所  若手キャリアアップ支援研究 

    道端 拓朗

      More details

    Authorship:Principal investigator  Grant type:Competitive

    researchmap

  • Understanding a morphology of aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions using numerical models and satellite observations

    2018.04 - 2019.03

    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science  KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Research Fellows (PD) 

    Takuro MICHIBATA

      More details

    Authorship:Principal investigator  Grant type:Competitive

    researchmap

  • Development of an advanced climate model with a synergistic use of satellite data

    2015.04 - 2018.03

    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science  KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Research Fellows (DC1) 

    Takuro MICHIBATA

      More details

    Authorship:Principal investigator  Grant type:Competitive

    researchmap

  • Development of new cloud and precipitation growth scheme to be applied to the climate model

    Grant number:15K12190  2015.04 - 2017.03

    Japan Society for the Promotion of Science  Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research  Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research

    Takemura Toshihiko, SUZUKI Kentaroh, MICHIBATA Takuro

      More details

    Grant amount:\3900000 ( Direct expense: \3000000 、 Indirect expense:\900000 )

    In the numerical simulation to reproduce and predict climate change, there is a high uncertainty in an expression of the growing process from cloud to rain. We tested several parameterizations for the process under the common circumstances, and understood each behavior comparing it with the satellite data in detail. After that, we newly developed a method to explicitly calculate the spatiotemporal distribution of raindrops and drizzle (water droplets having sizes between cloud droplets and raindrops) that have not yet been introduced in most climate models. The research results were submitted as peer-reviewed articles in international journals, accepted and published.

    researchmap

▼display all

 

Class subject in charge

  • Earth System Dynamics and Environment (2023academic year) Prophase  - その他

  • Advanced Seminar on Earth and Planetary Sciences (2023academic year) Year-round  - その他

  • Environmental Earth Sciences (2023academic year) Prophase  - その他

  • Directed Reading in Earth Science 2 (2023academic year) Fourth semester  - 火3~4

  • Directed Reading in Earth Science 5 (2023academic year) Third semester  - 木1~2

  • Gateway to Earth Science (2023academic year) 1st semester  - 火5~6

  • Basic Sciences of the Earth Training (2023academic year) 1st semester  - 火5~6

  • Atmospheric Science Laboratory (2023academic year) 1st semester  - 月5~8

  • Seminar of Atmospheric Science (2023academic year) Year-round  - その他

  • Seminar on Atmospheric Sciences (2023academic year) Other  - その他

  • Exercise of Atmosphere Science 1 (2023academic year) Third semester  - 木5~8

  • Exercise of Atmosphere Science 2 (2023academic year) 1st semester  - 月5~8

  • Atmosphere Science 11 (2023academic year) Third semester  - 月5~6

  • Atmosphere Science 12 (2023academic year) Fourth semester  - 月5~6

  • Atmosphere Science 5 (2023academic year) 1st semester  - 火1~2

  • Atmosphere Science 6 (2023academic year) Second semester  - 火1~2

  • Atmosphere Science C (2023academic year) 1st and 2nd semester  - 火1~2

  • Atmosphere Science F (2023academic year) 3rd and 4th semester  - 月5~6

  • Introduction to Earth Science Laboratory (2023academic year) Summer concentration  - その他

  • Satellite Remote Sensing (2023academic year) Late  - 金5~6

  • Satellite Remote Sensing (2023academic year) Late  - 金5~6

  • Earth System Dynamics and Environment (2022academic year) Prophase  - その他

  • Directed Reading in Earth Science 2 (2022academic year) Fourth semester  - 火3~4

  • Directed Reading in Earth Science 5 (2022academic year) Third semester  - 木1~2

  • Gateway to Earth Science (2022academic year) 1st semester  - 火5~6

  • Basic Sciences of the Earth Training (2022academic year) 1st semester  - 火5~6

  • Atmospheric Science Laboratory (2022academic year) 1st semester  - 月5~8

  • Seminar of Atmospheric Science (2022academic year) Year-round  - その他

  • Exercise of Atmosphere Science 1 (2022academic year) Third semester  - 木5~8

  • Exercise of Atmosphere Science 2 (2022academic year) 1st semester  - 月5~8

  • Atmosphere Science 11 (2022academic year) Third semester  - 月5~6

  • Atmosphere Science 12 (2022academic year) Fourth semester  - 月5~6

  • Atmosphere Science 5 (2022academic year) 1st semester  - 火1~2

  • Atmosphere Science 6 (2022academic year) Second semester  - 火1~2

  • Satellite Remote Sensing (2022academic year) Late  - 金5~6

  • Earth System Dynamics and Environment (2021academic year) Prophase  - その他

  • Directed Reading in Earth Science 2 (2021academic year) Fourth semester  - 火3,火4

  • Directed Reading in Earth Science 5 (2021academic year) Third semester  - 木1,木2

  • Gateway to Earth Science (2021academic year) 1st semester  - その他

  • Basic Sciences of the Earth Training (2021academic year) 1st semester  - その他

  • Atmospheric Circulation System (2021academic year) 1st and 2nd semester  - 火1,火2

  • Seminar of Atmospheric Science (2021academic year) Year-round  - その他

  • Atmosphere Science 11 (2021academic year) Third semester  - 月5,月6

  • Atmosphere Science 12 (2021academic year) Fourth semester  - 月5,月6

  • Atmosphere Science 5 (2021academic year) 1st semester  - 火1,火2

  • Atmosphere Science 6 (2021academic year) Second semester  - 火1,火2

  • Satellite Remote Sensing (2021academic year) Late  - 金5,金6

▼display all